Different instructors may have different policies on the use of generative AI in their classes. When citing AI in class assignments, students should make sure they understand what is and isn't allowed before using (and citing) generative AI.
Here are a couple of considerations for when and how to acknowledge the use of generative AI in assignments:
The use of generative AI in research and writing is an emerging and quickly evolving practice. Existing guidelines about how to incorporate and acknowledge generative AI in research are likewise evolving. Be flexible as you learn how to cite these tools.
In-text: (Author, Date)
Reference: Author. (Date). Title of tool (version) [Description of model]. URL
In-text: (OpenAI, 2023)
Reference: OpenAI. (2023). ChatGPT (Nov 30 version) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com/chat
Note: If you can't find the version date, try asking the tool, e.g., "Please identify the model and version you are using, including the update date if possible."
In-text: ("Description of prompt")
Works Cited: "Description of prompt" prompt. Name of AI tool, version of AI tool, Company, date text was generated. URL.
In-text: ("Identify the themes")
Works Cited: "Identify the themes in Mcteague by Frank Norris" prompt. ChatGPT, 30 Nov. version, OpenAI, 4 Dec. 2023. https://chat.openai.com/share/2f2be19d-eadd-4151-8ceb-0785319074b3.
In-text (for author-date): (Name of AI tool, date text was generated)
Note (for notes-bibliography): 1. Text generated by [AI tool and version], Company, date text was generated, public URL.
In-text: The following recipe for pizza dough was generated on December 9, 2023, by ChatGPT-3.5.
Note: 1. Text generated by ChatGPT-3.5, OpenAI, January 16, 2024, https://chat.openai.com/share/90b8137d-ff1c-4c0c-b123-2868623c4ae2.
Note: Typically, text generated by AI tools are not cited in a Chicago bibliography or reference list.